Bishop Schneider on what his mother’s tears taught him about Communion in the hand

From Advaticanum website:

Q: The Catholic Bishops’ Conference of Kazakhstan, with papal approval under Benedict XVI, made Communion kneeling and on the tongue the obligatory ordinary form and forbade Communion in the hand even for visitors. You have no extraordinary ministers, no female altar servers, and you have altar rails. How did that become possible, as this is almost unthinkable in much of Europe and North America?

Bishop Schneider: Well, first, they are the heirs of martyrs and confessors in Kazakhstan. And they had such a deep veneration for the Holy Eucharist—such a deep veneration. They could not imagine receiving our Lord standing. I know the old people still who suffered in the prisons. And I myself lived during the persecution in the underground Church in Kyrgyzstan. And then I was in Estonia. My parish priest was a holy priest who before, in Stalin’s time, was imprisoned in a concentration camp here in Kazakhstan. And he was a confessor, a living confessor. And he was my parish priest in Estonia. I made my first holy confession when I was ten years old with him. And he gave me my first Holy Communion; he prepared me, and my mother also. Therefore he instilled in us such a deep veneration for the Holy Eucharist, for the moment of Holy Communion.

And therefore, when we left for Germany, West Germany, at the end of ’73, I remember very well—I was almost thirteen—he gathered us. We were four children, and my parents, and he said, “Be careful. When you come to West Germany, there are some churches where Communion is given in the hand.” When my mother—I observed her—heard this, she reacted spontaneously. What a horror. She even cried. She was so shocked. “Is this possible?” And he said, “Yes, in West Germany, yes.” But he was not well informed. He said only in some churches. And he said, “Please don’t go to these churches where Communion is given in the hand”—a holy confessor priest. And my mother promised him, “We will never do it.” And then we came to Germany, and it was in all the churches the same situation.

When my mother said she had no other choice, she came home, I remember, and looked at us children: “Oh, my children, I cannot understand how people can treat our Lord in such a manner with Communion in the hand”, and she started to weep. And these tears of my mother inspired me later to write my small booklet, Dominus Est, on the dangers of Communion in the hand. And this is my booklet; the manuscript of my booklet Pope Benedict XVI approved personally in a personal letter to me, saying, “Your arguments are convincing.” He wrote this as Pope, personally to me.

In any case, and therefore, the bishops in Kazakhstan—it was nineteen years ago—said it is normal. We have to, out of respect for our confessors and even still surviving people in our parishes from the old times who suffered persecution, make sure that Communion is really received kneeling and on the tongue, and that foreigners must adapt themselves.

So I think I would wish every bishop in the world, every bishops’ conference, to do the same. This was, in the entire Catholic Church until 1969, the rule. More than a thousand years, and strictly observed. However, the dam was opened, and then came the flood. And who opened the dam? The Pope, Paul VI. We must be honest, please. He opened the door and allowed Communion in the hand. He made a consultation of all the bishops in the world in ’68, asking them if it would be meaningful and helpful to introduce Communion in the hand. And the majority of the bishops answered Pope Paul VI, “Please don’t allow it, because it will cause abuses, sacrileges, and a weakening of the faith.” These were the arguments.

And in spite of the warning of the bishops, in spite of these arguments, in spite of this, Paul VI opened the flood. This is a huge historical responsibility. He had to say, “No, I will not allow it.” I consider that Communion in the hand has caused irreverence and sacrileges in the Church, and is still causing them. It is one of the deepest wounds in the body of the Church and must be healed, of course, slowly.

But the first thing which must be done to restore the health of the body of the Church is to stop Communion in the hand. And it must be done by the Pope again. The Holy See opened the flood, and the Holy See must close it again. And of course, with gradual steps, but it must be done.

Communion in the Hand: Ancient Norm, Humanist Myth, or Protestant Rebellion?

Because the Apostles understood the Mass from day one, they understood it to mean exactly what the Church would later teach about it. They also understood the priesthood itself. Consequently, from the very dawn of the Church, a distinction existed between the ordained and the laity, not only in the administration of the sacraments in general, but also in matters concerning the Most Holy, namely, the handling of the Blessed Sacrament. Therefore, I doubt that the touching of the Blessed Sacrament by unordained faithful could ever have been the norm, rather than a deviation from it; in other words, that it was a legally permitted default practice.

Zsolt Orbán’s full essay is available here.

La Comunión en la mano: ¿norma antigua, mito humanista o rebelión protestante?

Dado que los Apóstoles comprendieron la Misa desde el primer día, la entendieron exactamente en el sentido en que la Iglesia enseñaría más tarde sobre ella. También comprendieron el propio sacerdocio. En consecuencia, desde los albores mismos de la Iglesia existió una distinción entre los ordenados y los laicos, no solo en la administración de los sacramentos en general, sino también en las cuestiones relativas a lo Santísimo, es decir, en la manipulación del Santísimo Sacramento. Por ello, dudo de que tocar el Santísimo Sacramento por parte de fieles no ordenados pudiera haber sido alguna vez la norma, en vez de una desviación respecto de ella; dicho de otro modo, una práctica ordinaria legalmente permitida.

Ensayo completo por Zsolt Orbán aquí.

The 1552 Institution of Anglican Communion in the Hand

Anglican communion in the hand was mandated in the Prayer Book of 1552 specifically to disabuse congregants of any belief in the Real Presence.
(…)
Communion in the hand was one of a slew of changes deliberately instituted to undermine belief in the Real Presence.
I am not suggesting the architects of Catholic communion in the hand had the exact same motives as Cranmer, but the fact remains that symbols mean things; they convey objective messages about what we believe and how we act those beliefs out ritually. The deliberate altering of long-established symbolic actions will result in a corresponding shift in what we be believe we are doing. The Anglican reformers clearly understood this principle, which is why Cranmer’s 1552 order mandated communion in the hand as deliberate gesture to erode belief in Transubstantiation.
The single greatest thing our bishops could do to bolster belief in the Real Presence is mandate communion kneeling on the tongue. Why don’t our own bishops understand what was so plainly evident to the likes of Thomas Cranmer?

Read full post here.

Resumen Ejecutivo de la Encuesta de la Coalición de la Presencia Real a Católicos Laicos de EE. UU.

Muchos encuestados abogan por recibir la Eucaristía arrodillados y en la lengua, reflejando mayor reverencia y respeto por la Presencia Real de Cristo en la Eucaristía.
(…)
Se expresaron preocupaciones sobre la práctica de recibir la Comunión en la mano, ya que se cree que conduce a una pérdida de reverencia y aumenta el riesgo de profanar la Eucaristía.

Resumen completo de la encuesta aquí.

Groundbreaking Survey of U.S. Catholics Reveals Path to Restoring Eucharistic Belief

Many respondents advocate for the reception of the Eucharist kneeling and on the tongue, reflecting greater reverence and respect for the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist.

(…)

Concerns were raised about the practice of receiving Communion in the hand, as it is believed to lead to a loss of reverence and increases the risk of profaning the Eucharist.

Survey results here.

I Cattolici statunitensi in maggioranza vogliono un solenne culto liturgico riverente e ricevere la Santa Comunione sulla lingua

Alla domanda su cosa abbia contribuito maggiormente alla perdita di fede nell’Eucaristia, gli intervistati hanno citato in modo schiacciante: la ricezione della Santa Comunione in mano, in piedi, con quasi il 58% che ha affermato che ha avuto il “maggiore” livello di impatto.

(…)

La maggioranza ha anche affermato che l’uso di ministri straordinari dell’Eucaristia, la sostituzione della musica sacra con musica contemporanea, la fine del culto ad orientem, la rimozione delle balaustre all’altare, la mancata celebrazione di eventi eucaristici come l’adorazione e le processioni, il declino della bellezza nell’architettura e nella liturgia delle chiese, la perdita del silenzio e la crisi degli abusi del clero hanno avuto un impatto “importante” o “il più grande”.

Leggi l’articolo completo qui.

Sacred Gestures and Symbols: Why Communion in the Hand is Unacceptable

Receiving Communion from the hand of the priest who is acting as alter Christus encapsulates in a very significant way the entire doctrine of the Church, which tells us that, regarding our salvation, the initiative and its fulfillment belongs to God.

Read the full article by Robert Lazu Kmita on The Remnant website here.

Traduzione in Italiano sul blog di A. M. Valli qui.